No deal.
The pants must go.

I agree, they should be required to wear no pants at all

;p

Banning yoga pants saves us all an eye full of something we don’t wanna see.
If you want skimpy… goto the beach/pool. 

@Gasai Yuno You make a lot of good points in this comment. I won’t argue with any of it.
I suppose, as previously stated, my comments mainly refer to “sexual abuse” cases that are brought on simply by lust, such as with those who wear revealing clothing then try to make a federal case out of getting ogled/groped by those who are drawn in by their enticing clothing items.

@ColorlessAngelz When it comes to inappropriate touching like groping, it’s never simply out of lust like some impulsive uncontrollable act of sexual gratification like you see in porn, but because they are abusers with a disregard to the boundaries of another person and want to overpower them (which is why they don’t bother getting consent first or stop when it’s been denied). To strike down another myth in case it gets mentioned, it’s not some miscommunication either when it’s just for wearing certain kinds of clothes. There is always something wrong in the head with a molester, which could also be from the influence of drugs.

A normal healthy minded person wouldn’t just inappropriately touch a person out of lust for wearing certain kinds of clothing, especially not a stranger. It never warrants nor justifies sexual misconduct. It is in fact sexual abuse, no quotations.

As for ogling, looking at someone in public is perfectly legal and no rights are being violated. You would be right when it comes to ogling, but not in the case of any touching.

@Gasai Yuno I see.

+ColorlessAngelz Then why can’t these people just control themselves!!!

because our minds take a backseat when it comes to the fundamental biological urges. your asking ppl to, try as they might, go against evolution.

@Gasai Yuno
In less affluent societies, kids had to help out with the job of survival and to hell with the learning.  Many societies are like that now.  Enforcing a dress code for kids is treating them like adults, which is a good thing.  Adults have their home lives, where they are free to dress and act like they want, and their work lives, which they are not.  Kids follow the same model, only their work is not to support the family, but to prepare themselves to support themselves and their families-to-be, if any.  The standards kids learn at school are the same standards they will use at work, with the teacher taking the place of the supervisor.  They might as well learn the correct way to dress in that situation.  They are free to wear whatever they want away from school.  What’s oppressive about that?

@joeschultz2 But this is American society we’re talking about. Not everyone is going to be a business monkey and kids aren’t in a place of business, but a place of learning. It’s the only time in there lives where they don’t have to wear uniforms. There’s no need for them to conform to business attire and look just like everyone else when they don’t have to cater to customers who need to identify them as workers. There isn’t a dire need for them to adhere to a strict dress code now in their lives to know how to dress if they have a job that requires a uniform or strict dress code. Not every career choice requires business suit attire, especially in the internet age where people can work at home wearing whatever they want. School just needs to foster creativity, innovation and freedom of expression to find their identities rather than conformism doing just what they’re told.

When I talked about kids being the most oppressed, I’m saying that they already lack a lot of freedoms adults have when you really think about it. So why not just give them this freedom of expression and cut them some slack while they are forced to go to this building 5 days a week for several hours packed with other kids their age?

@Gasai Yuno
The primary purpose of education is to give children the skills they need to function in society.  Not just academically, but also behaviorally as well-the child’s ideas of normal behavior in public are formed in school.  When a person dresses up for something, they are committing themselves to the idea that the activity is worth the effort to dress for.  It is a way of reinforcing the idea that school is important-not just something you drop into if you have the time and inclination.

Some jobs are physical and trousers and dress shirts-no need for suits, just neat attire-are not appropriate.  But just about all jobs in most business or government organizations require you to be neat and hold a certain standard as far as clothing.  Hair is the person’s choice, for they cannot change that when they leave the job and go home.  So  dreadlocks, long hair on men, etc, is okay as far as I’m concerned.  But trousers, not jeans, and a neat shirt with a collar is appropriate, and reinforces the idea to the student that something important is happening in that school.

+Gasai Yuno 🙁 At least american kids don’t have to wear a uniform :(((

+Gasai Yuno I’m so glad someone is commenting this!

@Dreekus TheDragon I’m fine with kids were yoga pants but not see through.

Basic they want ban yoga pants because they are tight fitting. So are skinny jeans. Yet this was target only at girls.

If tight clothes are issue why not other tight fitting clothes on both sexes.

yeah target both. Im down for that.

Make fair and have everyone where burkas.

Yep great point I agree ! See through is an issue otherwise just trying to control youth.

They did.